Play Tips
» Tips Index » Stacks of 3
Stacks of 3
By: moofrank
It is very hard to balance a piece against a stack of 3 unless you have a bubble in the board to hold the piece in.
If your opponent already has a stack of 3, however, it is a trivial matter to place your stack about 4 or 5 inches away, then immediately place your next piece almost vertically between the two stacks. The opposing magnetic forces make these a cinch.
I actually had always wondered if this is legal, but the pic on the cover of the rulebook shows an example of this placement.
7.0
Comments
Decent tip. I figured this out on my own (as i’m sure a lot of people did) and showed it to opticalsky when he couldnt figure out how to place a leaner on his tower.
If you have a tower of 3 int he middle on nowhere though we have found it impossible to lean against without a bubble. Maybe someone can prove us wrong though.
Can you use the red disk as an additional prop? If it (essentially) is "your color" and you had another foundation nearby, could you create a standing piece between your piece and the red piece? Just wondering how to adjudicate exactly which piece(s) you’re leaning against.
Not to poo-poo your post,Frank, but we commonly see folks playing on stacks of 3 or more discs. Just yesterday I saw a young man play against a stand-alone Tower with no other pieces in the vicinity. Yes, it can help to have a ‘bubble’ of supporting forces – but such bubbles can also have a negative effect, making it impossible for a legit placement.
With regard to ‘legality’: It IS legal, but only if your Standing Disc is legitimately the correct color (YOUR color) outward – and you are playing against your own Tower.






Unrated
My question: What exactly is the tactical advantage as opposed to say, a normal leaner on a tower of three?
I can see the advantage when using bigger towers, as it seems to be incredibly difficult to place a leaner on a tower of 4+. But a 3 is usually not that hard.